Survival and Technical Complication Rate of Partial and Full‐Arch All‐Ceramic Implant‐Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract

Background and aim: the aim of present study was evaluateSurvival and Technical Complication Rate of Partial and Full‐Arch All‐Ceramic Implant‐Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses.

Methods: From the electronic databases, PubMed, Scopus, LILACS, Web of Science, EBSCO, LIVIVO, and Embase have been used to perform a systematic literature over the last fiveyears between 2015 and 2021. Effect sizewith 95% confidence interval, random effect model and REMLmethod were calculated. The Meta analysis have been evaluated with the statistical software Stata/MP v.16 (The fastest version of Stata).

Results: 372 studies (Partial FDPs (n=154) and Full-arch FDPs (n=218)) were selected to review the abstracts, the full text of 97 (Partial FDPs (n=45) and Full-arch FDPs (n=52)) studies was reviewed. Finally, seven studies were selected. Implant survival rate of Partial FDPs and Full-arch FDPs was 98% (ES, 98% 95 % CI 94%, 100%)and 98% (ES, 98% 95 % CI 95%, 100%), respectively. Overall Prosthesis survival rate of Partial FDPs and Full-arch FDPs was 97% (ES, 97% 95 % CI 94%, 100%).

Conclusions: meta-analysis showed survival rate of implants and prostheses in Partial FDPs and Full-arch FDPs is high. The rate of technical complications for Partial FDPs and Full-arch FDPs was about 65%